It is little secret at this point that former U.S. Secretary of State and First Lady Hillary Clinton despises Donald Trump with a passion seldom seen in the light of day. I mean, she did attempt to rig the 2016 election in her favor and has been found behind countless attempts to unseat him from power.
However, evidence is now being revealed that she let her hatred for the former president surpass even her respect and care for human life – and on a worldwide scale, no less.
Among the ever-increasing number of documents, emails, letters, etc., to be found on Wikileaks exposing Hillary for the cheater and sore loser that she is, is a newly revealed cable from way back in 2009 when she was still Secretary of State and actually concerned with our national safety.
The cable was allegedly sent by Clinton, or at least her office at the time, and addressed to a few nations who are co-members of an organization known as The Australia Group. As their website states, the group is “an informal forum of countries which, through the harmonization of export controls, seeks to ensure that exports do not contribute to the development of chemical or biological weapons.”
Included in the group are nations such as the U.S., Australia, the United Kingdom, France, Argentina, and Japan. There are 43 nation members in all.
It is noted that historically problematic nations such as Russia, China, and North Korea are not included.
Now, in 2009, the group was making plans for a plenary meeting in Paris. And one topic Hillary wanted to discuss was the then-construction of the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s physical laboratories and facilities in Wuhan.
As Human Events editor Jack Posobiec reported on Wednesday, one cable from Clinton’s office to France seemed to warn of the impending damage such a laboratory could cause as well as ask for their opinion on the matter.
It read, “The U.S. believes participants would benefit from hearing about your experiences assisting China in setting up a Biosafety Level-4 (BSL-4) laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology from the export control and intangible technology transfer perspectives. We are particularly interested to know how China plans to vet incoming foreign researchers from countries of biological weapons proliferation concern.”
Apparently, she was concerned that safety precautions were needed to not only ensure nothing even remotely similar to biological warfare was being researched in the lab but also that any incoming experts were vetted to the fullest extent.
She wrote a similar message to Australia, asking for “any information you can share related to China and North Korea, specifically information related to: China’s Institutes of Biological Products, to include overhead imagery analysis, is possible; Your perceptions of CBW proliferation activities by Chinese entities; Your perceptions of Chinese government efforts to enforce its export control rules.”
She might have hit the nail a little squarer on the head this time.
As you know, the concern for ‘foreign researchers’ may have been unwarranted, at least in comparison to the safety and export controls that were clearly breached in late 2019 and began the coronavirus pandemic.
But there is no doubt that even before the lab in Wuhan was fully operational, Hillary had her concerns – and enough to reach out to a few other nations about them no less.
And yet, when COVID-19, in all its fury, hit our shores in 2020 and rumors began cycling about a possible outbreak from the very same Wuhan lab mentioned above, Hillary Clinton was silent.
Well, that’s not entirely true, is it?
While she was pretty much mum on the idea that the virus could have been a product of human research gone wrong, she was all too willing to throw then-President Donald Trump’s name through the mud – blaming him for it all. Meanwhile, in the back of Hillary’s head, there had to have been warning bells going off.
Or at least there should have been. A true leader and one who cared about the American people would have listened to those bells and likely brought them to someone’s attention. But in her deranged state of mind, thanks to her humiliating loss to Trump in 2016, she either couldn’t even hear them or wasn’t willing to acknowledge them.
Instead, she chose to let hundreds of thousands believe that COVID-19 was somehow just another product of Trump’s horrible legacy, allowing the real culprits of the pandemic to literally get away with murder.
Doesn’t that make Clinton an accomplice?